![]() How close is close enough, or should it be 100% accurate (given that I want to use direct monitoring)? I'll perform the Loopback Test today using the Desktop app thi time, and taking plenty of time between buffer changes. 18!!!! using Desktop Xair appĤ8k 1024 -24 (iPad App)… -18!!!! using Desktop Xair appīased on this, I set my Recording Delay offset to -18 and tried some recording The playback "sounds" in time, and when I zoom in on the wave form the peak is on or very close to the click or just after. Here are the (incomplete) results (the minuses should be plusses of course) Ĥ8k 128 -23 (iPad App)…. I don't understand WHY or IF this would make a difference, but I note the Desktop version has more functionality and, while still requiring a wifi connection to the interface, it is also physically tethered to the to the interface by USB. I was able to get these results, using the Desktop version of the mixer-app that controls the interface, instead of the iPad version. The picture above shows the USB serial port as COM 3. Verify that your serial port is listed and take note of the com port number. Open Device Manager and expand the Ports (COM & LPT). Connect the loopback plug to your computer. ![]() In fact, if I redo the ping without changing the buffer, it reads the same every time. Step 9: Windows Systems: Verify the Com Port. I performed the I/O Plug-in test again yesterday (multiple times) and found that I could get more predictable results by taking more time in between buffer size changes, and refreshing the driver each time. I do have a Novation Interface I could test. Grasping at straws here Could it be a faulty USB lead? Or a too long patch lead from the physical output to the physical input during the ping tests? Should I be using an unbalanced lead for this, rather than the mic lead I'm using? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I power-cycled the affected switch and everything came back online normally (there. I pulled the affected PC ethernet and pluged it into a different switch and ping worked fine. I can't even find some one who has had the same problem. I made a loopback plug (pins 1 & 3 crossed pins 2 & 6 crossed) and plugged it into an old 3Com switch for about 10 seconds, and got the port lights to light up. I've been struggling with this for a week. I've checked that Logic Pro and the XAIR are set to the same sample rate. It's as if the latency is constantly being changed. I make sure I click "Apply Changes" after each buffer size change, and even reset the driver by unchecking then checking the "Enable" box and clicking "Apply Changes". I have tried each of these readings in the recording delay setting, but when I record, there is still a recording latency. Check the working status of the port you are connecting, such as the port 50 in the following figure. Figure 3: Display the Working Status of All Ports. Review the interfaces status to confirm the working status of all ports on the switch. ![]() = -18 for 256 buffer size, some times = -14, -16 Check the software version of the switch. These are my I/O Plug-in Ping Test k Recording Delay = -, 512 buffer sizes, some times = -14, -16, -24 If you ping on 10.0.0.11, you wont get ping replies as there is. If you ping to this 10.0.0.10 address the ping will get ping replies, but you wont see any of this traffic in Wireshark (much like the 127.0.0.1 problem). The following will explain capturing on loopback interfaces a bit. These are my Loopback Test k Recording Delay = - , CaptureSetup/Loopback Loopback capture setup. It is used mainly for diagnostics and troubleshooting, and to connect to servers running on the local machine. The same thing happens when I perform the Loopback Test, but with different results. The loopback device is a special, virtual network interface that your computer uses to communicate with itself. Cisco internetworking devices provide a mechanism to automate the sending of many ping packets in sequence. at any given buffer size and sample rate. When I perform the I/O Plug-in Recording Delay Test, I get a different reading each time I perform the test. Parts one and two are included in the API specification.Hi, can any one help me with this? Ideas, thoughts, suggestions? Try it yourself by cloning the repository from GitHub.įor input/output testing, you are going to create three parts: Although the sample code includes a validated API spec and fullyįunctional hello-world controller, let’s pretend the controller is completelyĮmpty. Specifically hello-world in this section. The application implements the API as you have specified it. Once you confirm that the API specification is valid, it’s time to verify that Page are outdated and may not work out of the box. The top-down approach for building LoopBackĪpplications is not yet fully supported.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |